Search
JOIN OUR NETWORK

     

     

 

 

ARTICLE ARCHIVE
« Scientist whose work helped get atomic tests banned, dies at 90 | Main | National coalition urges U.S. Senate Democratic leaders to pass New START Treaty this year »
Wednesday
Dec222010

Ratifying START will be just a start unless U.S. begins to disarm

Ratifying START looks good on paper, but it may come at a heavy price, writes Alice Slater of Nuclear Age Peace Foundation and Abolition 2000. Obama has already promised the weapons labs $80 billion dollars to build  three new bomb factories and an additional $100 billion for new delivery systems. Then he threw in another $4 billion to try to win Republican votes for the treaty. In the meantime, assurances are being given that the futile missile defense system will move forward. Slater concludes: "But if the US persists in developing its nuclear infrastructure with new bomb factories while threatening Russia with proliferating missiles, having unilaterally pulled out of the US-Soviet 1972 Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty, then it's unlikely that this modest New START will help us down the path to peace."