Ratifying START will be just a start unless U.S. begins to disarm
December 22, 2010
admin

Ratifying START looks good on paper, but it may come at a heavy price, writes Alice Slater of Nuclear Age Peace Foundation and Abolition 2000. Obama has already promised the weapons labs $80 billion dollars to build  three new bomb factories and an additional $100 billion for new delivery systems. Then he threw in another $4 billion to try to win Republican votes for the treaty. In the meantime, assurances are being given that the futile missile defense system will move forward. Slater concludes: "But if the US persists in developing its nuclear infrastructure with new bomb factories while threatening Russia with proliferating missiles, having unilaterally pulled out of the US-Soviet 1972 Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty, then it's unlikely that this modest New START will help us down the path to peace."

Update on December 22, 2010 by Registered Commenteradmin

The Senate ratified the START Treaty shortly after 3pm today. A nice black eye for Sen. Kyl who said there wasn't time in the lame duck session - a clear stalling tactic. And a pretty big feather for Pres. Obama who made this one of his top foreign policy agendas. Now it remains to be seen whether the U.S. will begin meaninfgul disarmament.

Article originally appeared on Beyond Nuclear (https://archive.beyondnuclear.org/).
See website for complete article licensing information.