NEIS Action Alert -- Illinois’ Energy Legislation Vote Due Tuesday (Senate), Wednesday (House)! Exelon nuclear bailout bigger than before!

NEIS ACTION ALERT!

Illinois’ Energy Legislation Vote Due Tuesday (Senate),

Wednesday (House)!

Exelon nuclear bailout bigger than before!

Greetings All –

This will be the very last time we will contact you, asking you to ACT to oppose the nuclear bailouts for Exelon’s money-losing nuclear plants.

Currently there are competing version of legislation between the Governor and the Legislature.  Governor Pritzker has waffled on the size of the Exelon bailout in his proposed bill. What was once an independent, fact-based, $350 million 5-year bailout determined by the Governor-selected auditor, Synapse Energy Economics, has now ballooned to $700 million without rational justification or explanation. Another recent analysis suggests this amount could approach as high as $1 billion over time. Anything above the Synapse amount is political pork and nuclear ransom, reminiscent of “the Madigan Way” we thought we left behind.

The Governor’s rationale, that this bailout “…protects consumers and the climate…that we need to preserve our nuclear fleet and the jobs associated with that,” is both misinformed and wrong.  Consumers are the ones left paying this nuclear ransom. Despite its lower-carbon emissions profile, nuclear power has been demonstrated to be more a detriment than benefit in the climate crisis fight, sapping up money and resources better allocated to truly renewable energy sources, efficiency, energy storage and transmission improvements.  These industries already account for 4-5 times the number of jobs in Illinois compared to nuclear. 

While some would write this off as merely “politics,” we have to call it for what it is:

(legalized) extortion: “the act of securing money, favours, etc. by intimidation or violence.”

1.) CONTACT THE GOVERNOR AND YOUR ELECTED OFFICIALS:

This will likely be the simplest ask we’ve made of you yet:  contact the Governor, and tell him “We’ve got your back!  Don’t cave to Exelon.  Keep your pledge that you are ‘not going to sign a bill written by the utility companies.’”

Essential inclusions: Tell the Governor and your State Senator and Representative that the final legislation MUST include these:

1.)   No bailouts for Exelon’s unprofitable nuclear plants:  Nuclear bailouts have been shown to actually impede implementation of renewable energy.  It’s the communities and workers affected by plant closures who will need the bailout, not profitable Exelon.

2.)   Significant equity clauses and “just-transitions” programs for nuclear, coal, and other fossil fuel generator and mining communities faced with severe economic disruption as a result of their inevitable closures, ideally initiated prior to facility closure, and the funds escrowed to be available to the communities and workers to protect their tax base and create replacement economic opportunities when the facilities finally close.

3.)   Maximal financial support for an aggressive build-out of renewable energy, energy efficiency, energy storage, and improved electric transmission.  If you want a 100% renewable energy future, then build one.  Get to the State’s goal of 100% renewables by 2050 directly.  Don’t waste more  of OUR  time and OUR  money on soon to be extinct fossil fuels and nuclear power plants.  To insure energy equity, make sure these buildouts are given priority to communities already economically disadvantaged or damaged from dirty fossil fuels and nuclear power.

WHAT YOU MUST DO:

Contact the Governor FIRST, then your State Senator (tonight) and Representative (before Wednesday), telling them that you want these three demands included in the final energy legislation.

Go here to find out who your elected officials are and get their contact information.  Follow the instructions found there:

Here is the page you can go to to leave a direct message for the Governor:

https://www2.illinois.gov/sites/gov/contactus/Pages/VoiceAnOpinion.aspx

Here are phone numbers for the Governor you can call:

• ·  Chicago Phone: 312-814-2121 or 312-814-2122
• ·  Springfield Phone:  217-782-6830 or 217-782-6831

How to find your elected official

Thanks in advance.  We’ve done all we could.  Your energy future is now in YOUR  hands.

Be well, do great things,

--Dave Kraft, Director, NEIS--

David A. Kraft, Director

3411 W. Diversey #13

Chicago, IL  60647

(773)342-7650

neis@neis.org

www.neis.org

SKYPE address:  davekhamburg

NEIS is a member of EarthShare Illinois

No more Chornobyls!  No more Fukushimas!

Invest  in a nuclear-free world -- today!

NEIS STATEMENT ON ILLINOIS LEGISLATIVE INACTION ON ENERGY LEGISLATION

STATEMENT ON ILLINOIS LEGISLATIVE INACTION

 ON ENERGY LEGISLATION

June 1, 2021

Tick…tick…tick…

Everything in its own time.  Or so the old saying goes.  The Illinois Legislature demonstrated that old maxim once again by failing to vote before the end of Spring session on a critical piece of energy legislation designed to create Illinois’ energy future.

The Planet has its own schedule, too.  The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) frantically warned in October 2018 that we humans have at best 10 years left – until 2028 – to totally revamp our energy and economic systems, or risk an irreversible climate crisis that could threaten the very functioning of civilization as we have come to know it.  In this regard it’s important to recall another old maxim:  Nature bats last.

Like the grasshoppers in Aesop’s Fable, we, the Governor, and the Legislature ignore this imminent peril, and instead, content ourselves to “Count the victories,” as House Speaker Chris Welch, D-Hillside, advised yesterday as the clock stroked midnight.  Well, looks like it will now be easier to get to-go cocktails.  Come 2019 and beyond, we will need them, and much more.

In its neglect the Legislature once again failed to act to expand renewable energy and energy efficiency; close down dirty energy plants; protect communities and workers adversely affected by nuclear and coal plant closures; expand job and business equity and just-transitions in communities adversely affected by dirty energy; and most urgently -- address the climate crisis.

Perhaps almost as important, the Governor and the Legislature failed to act to end Exelon’s “Nuclear Hostage Crisis” business model consisting of threatening plant closures and jobs and tax-base loss if they don’t get ratepayer subsidized bailouts to prop up money-losing nuclear plants (and the corporate bottom line).  In other circles making threats to extract financial concessions is less-delicately known as – extortion.

While it appears at least for the moment ratepayers will not be turned into Exelon’s personal ATM through another nuclear bailout, unconfirmed reports tell that Governor Pritzker and his negotiators are still willing to play Exelon’s “Nuclear Hostage Crisis” game, reportedly offering as much as $600 million over 5 years to keep open three (it USED to be only 2) money-losing nuclear plants.  Earlier, the State commissioned an independent audit that determined that Exelon’s two financial dogs only needed ~$70 million per year for 5 years at most, maybe less if energy prices improved.  But – why let facts get in the way?

Such a bailout would ostensibly save the 1,200+ jobs at the Dresden and Byron nuclear plants – at a cost to ratepayers of ~$500,000 per job. (or is it – per vote?) Theoretically, that’s progress.  The 2016 bailout “saved” nuclear plants jobs at the tune of ~$1.5 million per job.

Beyond the immediate failure to launch a desperately needed energy future, it is also important to note that whatever energy legislation would have or still will be passed, many significant nuclear power issues remain unaddressed or totally ignored:  more nuclear waste production; totally absent fiscal oversight of reactor decommissioning funds; maintaining safe operations during future pandemics; the implications of the creation of Exelon’s “SpinCo” corporation consisting of (still money-losing) nuclear reactors. 

At the federal level, regulators at the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) are contemplating allowing plants to operate for up to 100 years – begging the question that, if these reactors are not profitable now and need bailing out, will this Nuclear Hostage Crisis go on for the next 40-50 years of plant operations, as the reactors age and expensive safety-related repairs are needed?  Who will be asked to pay for these? SpinCo with a gaggle of nuclear LLCs?  (guess again!).

And the Biden Administration is also making plans to allocate as much as $200 BILLION over the next ten years for nuclear power, much of it to create a “zero-emissions credit” (ZECs) fund to bailout out money-losing, uncompetitive nuclear power plants nationwide.  Will Exelon refund any current bailouts if this plan is adopted?

There will be energy legislation.  There must be.  When it is finally taken up, we sincerely hope that these significant issues are at the forefront of detailed, transparent, and public-involving discussion. 

We have a nuclear rhino in the living room, and can no longer dance around her. Stop paying off the nuclear hostage takers. No more nuclear bailouts.  If we want a truly clean-energy future, then build one - NOW.  We won’t get one by bailing out the past.  If we fail to do this, we’ll need a lot more than cocktails to-go.

--
David A. Kraft, Director

3411 W. Diversey #13

Chicago, IL  60647

(773)342-7650

neis@neis.org

www.neis.org

Illinois governor says clean energy deal not dead yet

As posted at Midwest Energy News:

POLICY: Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker says he is still hopeful that a deal can be reached over a statewide energy bill that boosts renewable energy investments and keeps Exelon nuclear plants operating. (WBEZ)

ANA: WHAT TO LOOK FOR IN THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY’S FY 2022 NUCLEAR WEAPONS AND CLEANUP BUDGET REQUEST

The Alliance for Nuclear Accountability

A national network of organizations working to address nuclear weapons production and waste cleanup

MEDIA ADVISORY:

WHAT TO LOOK FOR IN THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY’S FY 2022

NUCLEAR WEAPONS AND CLEANUP BUDGET REQUEST

May 26, 2021

For use with DOE’s scheduled budget release on Friday May 28, 2021

For more information, key contacts are listed below.

The White House is releasing its detailed Fiscal Year 2022 budget on Friday, May 28. A so-called “skinny budget” was released on April 9 that increased Department of Energy (DOE) funding to $46.1 billion, which reportedly includes major new investments in clean energy and climate change abatement. That said, historically roughly 60% of DOE’s funding has been earmarked for nuclear weapons production and cleanup of Cold War wastes and contamination. The pending budget release will finally provide details on those programs.

Because the budget release is so late Congress has already announced that it can’t consider the annual Defense Authorization Act until September. Related appropriations bills will no doubt be delayed too. This means that the government will probably have to run on a Continuing Resolution(s) for much of FY 2022 (which begins October 1, 2021).

The Alliance for Nuclear Accountability strongly opposed the massive 25% FY 2021 increase that the Trump Administration gave to the National Nuclear Security Administration’s (NNSA’s) nuclear weapons programs and proposed cuts to Department of Energy cleanup. In addition, DOE’s nuclear weapons and environmental management programs have been on the Government Accountability Office’s “High Risk List” for project mismanagement and waste of taxpayers’ dollars for 28 consecutive years. Related, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) has just released a report that projects a 28% increase in costs for so-called “modernization” of U.S. nuclear forces that between the Defense Department and DOE is expected to cost around $1.7 trillion over 30 years.

The Alliance for Nuclear Accountability, a 34-year-old network of groups from communities downwind and downstream of U.S. nuclear weapons sites, will be analyzing the following critical issues. For details, contact the ANA leaders listed at the end of this Advisory.

General Budget Issues

•     Will DOE and NNSA submit to Congress legally required reports on unspent balances from previous years? As Congress moves through the legislative process, will authorizers and appropriators subtract “Prior Year Balances” from amounts requested by DOE and NNSA in the FY 2022 budget?

•     As evidenced by the recent CBO report, escalating “modernization” costs will be a chronic concern. To help meet that concern, will NNSA include in its FY 2022 budget request legally required four year cost projections for its major programs?

Nuclear Warheads

•     The W87-1 will be the first new warhead with wholly new components. The Trump Administration projected $691 million for the W87-1 in FY 2022. Will the first Biden budget request constrain this warhead program? [Note: the W87-1 is slated to top the Air Force’s new “Ground Based Strategic Deterrent” missile and is the also the driver for NNSA’s planned expanded production of plutonium “pit” bomb cores, in all expected to cost more than $140 billion.]

•     The W93 is a proposed new submarine-launched warhead whose main advocate is the United Kingdom, which substantially relies on U.S. warhead designs and plans to increase its own nuclear weapons stockpile. The Trump Administration projected $80 million in FY 2022 to jumpstart this warhead’s development. Will the Biden budget fully fund this new program? Does the U.S. Navy really want this new-design warhead when its own existing warheads have already been tested and are being upgraded?

•     Trump’s 2018 Nuclear Posture Review proposed to bring back nuclear-armed sea-launched cruise missiles (SLCMs), which were retired by President George H.W. Bush after the end of the Cold War. Will the FY 2022 Biden budget fund NNSA to conduct warhead design activities for this Cold War relic? Or will it cancel the program? Does the U.S. Navy really want the expense of having to certify attack submarine crews for nuclear-armed SLCMs?

•     The B83, the last U.S. megaton-class nuclear bomb, had been slated for retirement prior to Trump’s Nuclear Posture Review reversing its course. Will the Biden FY 2022 budget request include funding to keep it in the stockpile – or to fund its promised retirement?

Nuclear Weapons Production 

•     The Commander of Strategic Command recently testified to Congress that expanded production of plutonium “pit” bomb cores is the #1 “modernization” issue. The Trump Administration increased “Plutonium Modernization” by 70% to $3.4 billion in FY 2022. Will the Biden Administration keep that level of funding for FY 2022?

•     What portion of that funding will be for upgrades to the Los Alamos National Laboratory’s aging plutonium facility so the Lab can produce more than 30 pits per year? How much will be for fast tracking the new Plutonium Bomb Plant at the Savannah River Site (SRS) in South Carolina to make 50 or more plutonium pits per year?

•     NNSA’s current cost estimate to “repurpose” the failed MOX plant at SRS (which has already cost taxpayers $7 billion) to pit production is $4.6 billion. NNSA’s “Critical Decision-1” to proceed with the bomb plant is expected soon after Biden’s FY 2022 budget release, with likely escalating costs of $10 billion or more. Will that throw a major monkey wrench into NNSA’s plans of simultaneous pit production at both LANL and SRS? What impact will that have on Congressional authorization and appropriations?

•     Is the rationale for expanded plutonium pit production changing from being a “hedge” against technical and geopolitical surprise to replacing all pits in all ~4,000 active and reserve nuclear weapons over the next 50 years? Why is expanded plutonium pit production needed to begin with when the U.S. already has more than 15,000 pits in storage and independent experts have found that pits last at least a century?

•     NNSA has claimed that the Uranium Processing Facility at the Y-12 Plant near Oak Ridge, TN is on time and will meet its declared budget cap of $6.5 billion. However, that is after NNSA moved the goal posts and eliminated non-production missions such as dismantlements and downblending of highly enriched uranium (which would save large security and nuclear safety costs). Because of the UPF’s downscoping, NNSA has decided to continue operating two old contaminated facilities that can never meet modern safety and seismic standards. When is NNSA going to own up to exceeding the UPF budget cap that it promised time and again to Congress?

•     Will NNSA’s budget seek adequate funds to decontaminate and decommission excess “High Risk Facilities” at Oak Ridge, Livermore and other nuclear weapons sites, or will officials continue to ignore the “ever increasing risk” (the DOE Inspector General’s description) to workers and the public until it’s too late?

Cleanup

• Will the budget request comply with the law (National Defense Authorization Act of FY 2020, Sec. 4409) and include for Fiscal Years 2022-2026 annual estimates of the costs of meeting legal cleanup milestones at each DOE site? DOE has never provided such cost estimates, which would demonstrate that the budget request is many tens of millions of dollars short of what is required by legal agreements with host states.
  
  
• Will DOE include the lifecycle cost estimate to clean up its nuclear sites? Chronic underfunding of DOE environmental programs leads to ever-increasing lifecycle cleanup costs — from $341.6 billion in FY 2016 to $388.2 billion in FY 2018 to $413.9 billion in FY 2019, to providing no lifecycle costs in FY 2020 and FY 2021.

•  Does the budget again include funding for "Consolidated Interim Storage" for commercial irradiated fuel (AKA lethal high-level radioactive wastes)? Previous budgets have included that money even though DOE funding of private storage sites is prohibited by federal law and Congress refuses to appropriate the funds.

• How much funding is provided for Small Modular Reactors (SMRs)? [Note: $115 million appropriated in FY 2021.] Such funds are a bailout to the failing nuclear energy industry since SMRs are not technically or financially viable.

• What funding will Congress request for the proposed new 2,100 foot deep utility shaft at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) even though the shaft project does not yet have permit approval from the State of New Mexico? In FY 2021 Congress requested $50 million, which brought total funding of the proposed shaft to $164 million. This represents 83% of the total estimated cost of the shaft of $197 million for a project, which, if finally approved by the State, will no doubt bust its budget.

•     How much will Congress request for the American Centrifuge Plant in Portsmouth, Ohio? In 2019, the American Centrifuge Operating, LLC entered into a contract with the DOE to build centrifuges to demonstrate production of high-assay, low-enriched uranium (HALEU). Production is about to be licensed by the NRC and would begin an unneeded new nuclear program at a site with a history of safety issues. The technology and use of HALEU also opens the capacity for production of highly enriched uranium, which would be a dangerous proliferation risk.

• Will the budget request include funding to begin work on new storage and staging tanks for high-level tank waste at the Hanford Reservation in Washington state? DOE wants to reclassify high-level waste. To close the tank farms where this waste is stored, DOE wants to reclassify any waste remaining in the Hanford tanks after treatment and leave the waste in the bottom of the tanks rather than removing and treating it. New tanks are needed to replace leaking tanks while DOE makes final decisions on cleanup.

# # #

The annual DOE and NNSA Congressional Budget Requests are typically available on the scheduled release date by 1:00 pm EST at https://www.energy.gov/cfo/listings/budget-justification-supporting-documents

For information about specific DOE and NNSA nuclear weapons sites and programs, contact:

Los Alamos Lab Pit Production and Life Extension Programs-

      Jay Coghlan: 505.989.7342 jay@nukewatch.org

Livermore Lab and Life Extension Programs-

      Marylia Kelley: 925.443.7148 marylia@trivalleycares.org

Uranium Processing Facility and Dismantlements -

      Ralph Hutchison: 865.776.5050 orep@earthlink.net

Pit Production and MOX Plant at the Savannah River Site -

      Tom Clements: 803.240.7268 tomclements329@cs.com

Environmental Management, the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant and Yucca Mountain –

      Don Hancock: 505.262.1862 sricdon@earthlink.net

The American Centrifuge Plant in Portsmouth, Ohio

      Vina Colley, 740 357 8916 vcolley@earthlink.net

Fallout continues from $60+ million bribe for $1 billion+ bailout for 2 dangerously age-degraded OHIO atomic reactors

As featured in today's Midwest Energy News:

OHIO: State lawmakers introduce resolutions to expel former House Speaker Larry Householder, who was arrested last year on federal bribery and racketeering charges related to the state’s scandal-tainted power plant bailout law. (Columbus Dispatch)

ALSO: Cleveland’s city council president signs three subpoenas related to the nonprofit entity involved in passing the power plant subsidy law. (WKYC)