Search
JOIN OUR NETWORK

     

     

 

 

Reprocessing

Reprocessing - the chemical separation of uranium and plutonium from irradiated reactor fuel - is arguably the most dangerous and dirty phase of the nuclear fuel chain. Reprocessing generates huge waste streams with no management solution and isolates plutonium, the fissile component of a nuclear weapon. Countries such as England and France, where reprocessing has been carried out for decades, face a legacy of contamination and an enormous plutonium surplus vulnerable to theft or attack.

.................................................................................................................................................................................................................

Wednesday
Dec022009

West Valley, NY: case study in reprocessing's environmental devastation 

West Valley, New York is the only site in the U.S. to ever carry out commercial radioactive waste reprocessing. In six short years of operation, from 1966-1972, it massively contaminated its surrounding environment. A comprehensive 2008 report, "The Real Costs of Cleaning Up Nuclear Wastes: A Full Cost Accounting of Cleanup Options for the West Valley Nuclear Waste Site," has documented that protecting the Great Lakes downstream will cost a whopping $10-27 BILLION! Additional background information on the history and current status of West Valley can be found at the website of Nuclear Information and Resource Service.

Wednesday
Dec022009

International reports on the status of reprocessing worldwide

The International Panel on Fissile Materials has published a collection of comprehensive reports detailing the status of reprocessing in a number of countries that currently do it (Russia, the U.K., France, and India) are soon to (Japan), or are flirting with the idea of doing so again (the U.S.).

Saturday
Jul112009

The perils of reprocessing

Read a good letter to the editor in the Rutland Herald about the perils of reprocessing.

Saturday
Jul112009

Top ten reasons reprocessing is environmentally devastating

Read the "Top Ten Reasons Reprocessing is Environmentally Devastating," a list of talking points prepared by Kevin Kamps of Beyond Nuclear to oppose the Department of Energy's proposed Global Nuclear Energy Partnership (GNEP).

Saturday
Jul112009

Reprocessing creates multiple waste streams

The Center for Arms Control and Non-proliferation produced a useful graph showing the multiple waste streams that would be generated by the Global Nuclear Energy Partnership's reprocessing and "advanced burner reactors."

Page 1 ... 2 3 4 5 6