When "FirstEnergy says PUC vote assures Davis-Besse operation for several years," Beyond Nuclear begs to differ
This   still images comes from a U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission video.  The  yellow arrow shows a sub-surface crack in Davis-Besse's concrete   containment Shield Building wall. The cracking was revealed during an   October 2011 reactor lid replacement. The cracking grows by a half-inch,   or more, in length, every time it freezes out, due to Ice-Wedging  Crack  Propagation, due to water locked in the walls by FENOC's 2012  "White  Wash" weather sealant of the Shield Building exterior, 40 years  too  late.In an article entitled "FirstEnergy says PUC vote assures Davis-Besse operation for several years," Nucleonics Week reporter Michael McAuliffe quoted Beyond Nuclear's Kevin Kamps:
A coalition of anti-nuclear and environmental groups including Beyond Nuclear was also critical of the PUC decision.
“PUCO’s $4 billion bailout to FirstEnergy will mostly go towards padding the pockets of company executives and shareholders, not to critically needed repairs of safety systems, structures, and components,” Beyond Nuclear spokesman Kevin Kamps said in a March 31 statement.
[FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company, FENOC, spokesman] Colafella said “there are currently no major capital improvements needed at Davis-Besse.” But the coalition said that among needed plant maintenance is repairing a shield building which has a multitude of cracks. The shield building protects the reactor from impact by external objects.
Kamps questioned whether Davis-Besse will be able to remain in   operation for the eight years covered by the plan and said in an April 4   interview that FirstEnergy does not “plan on plowing much of their   bailout back into maintenance, and the NRC didn’t require it.” More.





 April 7, 2016
April 7, 2016