Judge rules Vermont Yankee Mark I can stay open. Citizens will feel differently
 January 23, 2012
January 23, 2012  The    decision on January 19 by federal judge Garvan Murtha, ruled that the    state of Vermont cannot order the closure of its reactor, Vermont    Yankee, on March 21, 2012 when its current license expires. The US    Nuclear Regulatory Commission had already re-licensed the plant for    another 20 years (doing so 10 days after the inception of the    Fukushima-Daiichi reactor meltdowns that are the same design as Vermont    Yankee.) Murtha said federal law pre-empts the state's ability to    determine the licensing of a nuclear power plant because the reasoning    was "radiological safety" concerns which the judge said the state is  not   authorized to regulate. The decision effectively deprives the  state of   the ability to protect its own citizens even though the  regulator,  NRC,  clearly did not have the safety of Vermonters in mind  when  extending the  plant's operating license. The decision is all the  more  alarming given  the numerous safety problems at the plant and the   deception by its  owners, Entergy, who denied the existence of buried   pipes that had in  fact leaked tritium.
The    decision on January 19 by federal judge Garvan Murtha, ruled that the    state of Vermont cannot order the closure of its reactor, Vermont    Yankee, on March 21, 2012 when its current license expires. The US    Nuclear Regulatory Commission had already re-licensed the plant for    another 20 years (doing so 10 days after the inception of the    Fukushima-Daiichi reactor meltdowns that are the same design as Vermont    Yankee.) Murtha said federal law pre-empts the state's ability to    determine the licensing of a nuclear power plant because the reasoning    was "radiological safety" concerns which the judge said the state is  not   authorized to regulate. The decision effectively deprives the  state of   the ability to protect its own citizens even though the  regulator,  NRC,  clearly did not have the safety of Vermonters in mind  when  extending the  plant's operating license. The decision is all the  more  alarming given  the numerous safety problems at the plant and the   deception by its  owners, Entergy, who denied the existence of buried   pipes that had in  fact leaked tritium.
Watch this page for strategic developments from the Vermont coalition which opposes the continued operation of the reactor.
 admin |  Comments Off  |
admin |  Comments Off  |   



