Holtec/ELEA CISF proponents' responses to opponents' legal interventions

NRC STAFF’S CONSOLIDATED RESPONSE TO PETITIONS TO INTERVENE AND REQUESTS FOR HEARING FILED BY: ALLIANCE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL STRATEGIES, BEYOND NUCLEAR, INC., DON’T WASTE MICHIGAN, ET AL., NAC INTERNATIONAL INC., AND THE SIERRA CLUB;

Holtec International’s Answer Opposing Beyond Nuclear Inc. Hearing Request and Petition to Intervene on Holtec International’s HI-STORE Consolidated Interim Storage Facility Application;

Holtec International’s Answer Opposing Beyond Nuclear’s Motion for Leave to Reply to Holtec International, Interim Storage Partners LLC, and NRC Staff Responses to Beyond Nuclear’s Motion to Dismiss;

Holtec International’s Answer Opposing the Don’t Waste Michigan, Citizens’ Environmental Coalition, Citizens for Alternatives to Chemical Contamination, Nuclear Energy Information Service, Public Citizen, Inc., San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace, and Nuclear Issues Study Group Petition to Intervene and Request for an Adjudicatory Hearing on Holtec International’s HI-STORE Consolidated Interim Storage Facility Application;

Holtec International’s Answer Opposing Sierra Club’s Petition to Intervene and Request for Adjudicatory Hearing on Holtec International’s HI-STORE Consolidated Interim Storage Facility Application;

Holtec International’s Answer Opposing NAC [Nuclear Assurance Corporation] International Inc’s Petition to Intervene and Request for Hearing on Holtec International’s HI-STORE Consolidated Interim Storage Facility Application;

Holtec International’s Answer Opposing Fasken Land and Minerals, Ltd.’s and Permian Basin Land and Royalty Owners’ Motion for Leave to Reply to Holtec International and NRC Staff Responses to Motion to Dismiss;

Holtec International’s Answer Opposing Alliance [for] Environmental Strategies’ [AFES] Petition to Intervene and Request for Adjudicatory Hearing on Holtec International’s HI-STORE Consolidated Interim Storage Facility Application.

These Oct. 9 responses and answers, by NRC staff and Holtec, are in reply to CISF opponents' filings of Sept. 14th. A broad coalition legally intervened in opposition to Holtec's CISF. Holtec and NRC staff had 25 days to respond. Now oppoents to the CISF have just 7 days to respond to Holtec and NRC's filings of Oct. 9th.