Thursday
Oct152020
  
  
  
  Nuclear Utility Refuses To Investigate Possible Damage at D.C. Cook; Similarities to Near-Accident in 2002
| 
 | ||
| Eighteen Reactor Penetration Welds Go Unscrutinized at D.C. Cook Nuclear Plant | ||
| Nuclear Utility Refuses to Investigate Possible Damage to Reactor Vessel; Similarities to Near-Accident In 2002 | ||
| BRIDGMAN, MI -- Last  Friday a coalition of regional and national safe energy  groups  submitted public comment in opposition to the emerging dangerous   approval and operation of the D.C. Cook nuclear power plant. Indiana   Michigan Power Company (IMPC) has requested exemption from inspection of   nearly one-third of the penetration welds going into the reactor.  The coalition urges the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) to   deny IMPC’s request for emergency relief, excusing IMPC from  performing  penetration weld inspections of the D.C. Cook, Unit 1,  reactor pressure  vessel (RPV) head. IMPC’s request suggests a serious  threat to public  health and safety from the continued operation of Unit  1, which is an  aging and deteriorating nuclear power plant in its  safety-significant  systems, structures and components. IMPC is balking at being required by ASME codes to inspect 18   penetration welds on the RPV because they are covered by insulation or   visually blocked by equipment. Of 29 RPV penetration welds inspected so   far, half showed boric acid crystal, corrosion, discoloration,  staining,  and streaming, evidently the result of borated reactor  cooling water  leaking onto the vessel. What is at risk is creation of a  hole in the  RPV, similar to what was discovered at Ohio’s Davis-Besse  Nuclear Power  Station in 2002, when boric acid ate a football-sized,  jagged hole  through six inches of carbon steel of the RPV.  But because of difficulty in accessing 18 penetration welds for inspection, IMPC now urgently seeks the NRC’s permission to skip mandated examinations of control rod drive mechanism nozzles for cracks, pleading hardship. The original RPV head for D.C. Cook, Unit 1 was replaced in 2006. The replacement head featured a new design for the thermocouple sealing assembly and reactor vessel head vent penetration. What is at risk is a core melt accident. David Lochbaum, retired nuclear engineer advising the coalition,   states that when boric acid residue is discovered around a nozzle, the   American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) code requires that the   inside of the nozzle, and its J-groove weld, be examined for signs of   cracking and leaking. This way, it can be conclusively determined   whether the nozzles are, or are not, the source of the boric acid.   According to Lochbaum, "Davis-Besse found boric acid atop the reactor   vessel head and attributed it to borated water leaking from where the   upper ends of the CRDM nozzles are bolted to the drive motor assemblies.   FirstEnergy contended that flange leaking caused borated water to rain   down on the reactor vessel head. They were wrong and paid a high price   for their extremely poor judgement -- a record NRC fine and an  extended  outage costing nearly a billion dollars." "In 2001-2002, FirstEnergy spent thousands of dollars to literally   lobby the NRC not to regulate, and the result was the nearest to a   catastrophic nuclear accident the industry had come since Three Mile   Island. D.C. Cook is Déjà-Besse all over again,” observed Toledo   attorney Terry Lodge, who prepared the coalition's comments. “Approval by the NRC of the D.C. Cook emergency exemption is   tantamount to aiding and abetting criminal negligence in the operation   of an increasingly degraded nuclear reactor.  This was precisely the   situation at the Davis-Besse ‘hole-in-the-head’ reactor in 2002.    Lessons learned? The NRC is incapable of learning lessons,” stated   Michael J. Keegan with Don’t Waste Michigan. Kevin Kamps of Beyond Nuclear said: "The NRC-commissioned, and   Sandia National Laboratory-conducted, 1982 CRAC-II report, short for   Calculation of Reactor Accident Consequences, shows how catastrophic a   reactor core meltdown at Cook Unit 1 would be. The CRAC-II report, also   known as the Sandia Siting Study, or as NUREG/CR-2239, provides the   following predicted casualty figures for a meltdown at Cook 1: 1,900   peak early fatalities, or acute radiation poisoning deaths; 80,000 peak   early radiation injuries; and 13,000 peak cancer deaths (latent cancer   fatalities). The report also estimated $91.9 billion in property damage   downwind and downstream of a Cook 1 meltdown. But as Associated Press   investigative journalist Jeff Donn reported in his 2011 series "Aging   Nukes" after the Fukushima nuclear catastrophe in Japan had begun,   populations have soared around nuclear power plants like Cook since   1982, so casualties would be significantly higher today. And adjusting   for inflation alone, but not accounting for the significant economic   development in the area since 1982, property damage would now surpass   $246 billion, when expressed as Year 2019 dollar figures. And, as   Fukushima has shown, domino effect meltdowns are possible. If Cook 1's   meltdown led to a consequent meltdown at the co-located Cook Unit 2, the   casualties and property damage would more than double, CRAC-II   reported." Photographs here: http://www.beyondnuclear.org/safety/2020/10/13/indiana-michigan-power-co-supplement-to-request-for-relief-r.html Link to the 22-page document made public 10/13/2020 (The photographs begin on page 5 of 22 on the PDF counter, and continue to page 22 of 22.) The coalition consists of Beyond Nuclear, Citizens Action Coalition   of Indiana, Don't Waste Michigan, Michigan Safe Energy Future, Nuclear   Energy Information Service of Illinois, and Nuclear Information and   Resource Service.  The coalition public comment letter on D.C. Cook, Unit 1's request   for relief from nozzle inspection, Code Case N-727, as it was sent to   the NRC via email on Friday, October 9, 2020 from Terry J. Lodge, is linked here, and includes Dave Lochbaum's Summary Report, attached. To go directly to Lochbaum's Summary Report, use this link below: Going forward to track documentation and updates please use this link to Beyond Nuclear webpage postings on D.C. Cook:  http://www.beyondnuclear.org/safety/.   -30- | ||
| Beyond Nuclear is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit membership organization. Beyond Nuclear aims to educate and activate the public about the connections between nuclear power and nuclear weapons and the need to abolish both to safeguard our future. Beyond Nuclear advocates for an energy future that is sustainable, benign and democratic. The Beyond Nuclear team works with diverse partners and allies to provide the public, government officials, and the media with the critical information necessary to move humanity toward a world beyond nuclear. Beyond Nuclear: 7304 Carroll Avenue, #182, Takoma Park, MD 20912. Info@beyondnuclear.org. www.beyondnuclear.org. | 






 October 15, 2020
October 15, 2020