Search
JOIN OUR NETWORK

     

     

 

 

Centralized Storage

With the scientifically unsound proposed Yucca Mountain radioactive waste dump now canceled, the danger of "interim" storage threatens. This means that radioactive waste could be "temporarily" parked in open air lots, vulnerable to accident and attack, while a new repository site is sought.

.................................................................................................................................................................................................................

Entries by admin (702)

Thursday
Sep052019

ISP moves to moot only contention admitted by NRC ASLB in WCS CISF licensing proceeding

As made clear by postings at the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NRC) website on September 5, 2019, Interim Storage Partners (ISP) has moved to moot the only contention admitted by NRC's Atomic Safety and Licensing Board (ASLB), in the Waste Control Specialists (WCS) consolidated interim storage facility (CISF) licensing proceeding.

Sierra Club was the only intervenor to achieve both legal standing, and an admitted contention, in the proceeding. Sierra Club's contention has to do with two species of endangered lizards, which would be harmed if the ISP CISF for "temporary storage" of 40,000 metric tons of irradiated nuclear fuel and highly radioactive GTCC (Greater-Than-Class-C "low-level" radioactive waste) is constructed and operated. Sierra Club is represented by Cedar Rapids, Iowa attorney Wally Taylor.

Other intevenors, including Beyond Nuclear and Fasken Oil, did achieve legal standing, but the ASLB admitted none of their contentions for a hearing on the merits. Beyond Nuclear is represented by Washington, D.C. attorney Diane Curran, as well as Atlanta, Georgia attorney Mindy Goldstein.

A seven-group, national grassroots environmental coalition (Don't Waste Michigan et al.) was even denied legal standing. The coalition is represented by Toledo, Ohio attorney Terry Lodge.

All environmental intevenors have committed to appealing all adverse rulings by the ASLB to the full Nuclear Regulatory Commission itself, just as they have in the Holtec International/Eddy-Lea Energy Alliance CISF licensing proceeding. Holtec/ELEA propose "interim storage" for a whopping 173,600 metric tons of highly radioactive wastes. ISP/WCS in Andrews County, Texas, and Holtec/ELEA in southeast New Mexico, are located just 39 miles apart.

Friday
Aug302019

Holtec Ignores New Mexico State Land Office Authority

As reported by Concerned Citizens for Nuclear Safety (CCNS) of Santa Fe, NM.

CCNS references a Beyond Nuclear action alert re: high-level radioactive waste (HLRW) truck, train, and barge shipment risks, bound for the Holtec/ELEA CISF (consolidated interim storage facility) targeted at s.e. NM. Beyond Nuclear cited State of Nevada Agency for Nuclear Projects' analyses of road, rail and waterway routing to Yucca Mountain, NV. The futher away from the Southwest HLRW shipments originate, the more identical routing to NV or NM would be. Holtec has provided little to no information re: routing in its license application documents, and NRC has not required them to provide more information -- a point opponents to the CISF have raised in the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board proceedings. But the contentions have fallen on deaf ears. The ruling has been appealed to the NRC Commissioners.

Monday
Aug262019

HOLTEC INTERNATIONAL’S ANSWER OPPOSING FASKEN’S LATE-FILED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A NEW CONTENTION

Monday
Aug262019

NRC STAFF ANSWER IN OPPOSITION TO FASKEN OIL AND RANCH, LTD. AND PERMIAN BASIN LAND AND ROYALTY OWNERS’ MOTION TO FILE A NEW CONTENTION

Friday
Aug232019

NRC ASLB admits single contention in WCS/ISP CISF licensing proceeding

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Atomic Safety and Licensing Board (ASLB) has ruled in the Waste Control Specialists/Interim Storage Partners (WCS/ISP) consolidated interim storage facility (CISF) licesning proceeding.

The ASLB has acknowledged legal standing for Beyond Nuclear, Fasken Oil, and Sierra Club. All other intervening parties' legal standing was rejected (namely, a seven-group, national grassroots environmental coalition, represented by Toledo, OH attorney, Terry Lodge).

However, only a single contention by Sierra Club was granted a hearing on the merits. Beyond Nuclear's and Fasken's (represented by Lawrence, KS attorney Robert Eye) contentions, despite acknowledgement of the groups' legal standing, were rejected as not meriting a hearing. Sierra Club is represented by legal counsel Wally Taylor of Cedar Rapids, IA.

See the ASLB ruling, here. See NRC's press release, here.

Most to all opponents to WCS/ISP's CISF -- Beyond Nuclear included -- plan to appeal their rejection by the ASLB within 25 days, to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commissioners themselves, by the NRC's deadline.

Then, if ruled against by the Nuclear Regulatory Commissioners, Beyond Nuclear -- and perhaps other parties as well -- will appeal to the federal courts.

Similar appeals are already underway in the Holtec International/Eddy-Lea Energy Alliance CISF licensing proceeding in New Mexico, just 39 miles from WCS/ISP's Andrews County, West Texas location.

In both the WCS/ISP, TX and the Holtec/ELEA, NM CISF proceedings, Beyond Nuclear's legal counsel are Diane Curran of Harmon Curran in Washington, D.C., and Mindy Goldstein of Turner Environmental Law Clinic at Emory University in Atlanta, GA.